August 26th, 2007
by in

Back Top

Responses to “emcard0006.jpg”

  1. recent recommendations suggest aiming for MAP of closer to 85 in post-arrest patients.

  2. this is a test comment.

    testing123 at
  3. here is another test comment.

    testing123 at
  4. I like how you distilled down the big question here.

    my question*: you focus mostly on cases that end up being reviewed — is there an inherent bias in the cases referred for review? e.g. someone involved in the case thought that a certain procedure should have happened?

    *actual, not loaded

  5. test

    thekelly at
  6. test comment

    thekelly at
  7. test comment #2

    thekelly at
  8. is there a bias in the cases that get reviewed? ie cases where something should have happened are more likely to end up in review

Leave a Reply